<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chopstork</title>
	<link>http://www.chopstork.com/blog</link>
	<description>Coming soon to a restaurant near you.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Verizon math infects AT&#038;T</title>
		<link>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/07/01/verizon-math-infects-att/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/07/01/verizon-math-infects-att/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>some dude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Whatever</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>dorking out</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/07/01/verizon-math-infects-att/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.
You&#8217;ve probably seen this check to Verizon in an email before.  It was written by the comic xkcd in response to George Vacarro&#8217;s discovery that Verizon can&#8217;t tell the difference between 0.002 cents and $0.002.  The whole story is at that link, but this recording of the call says it all (it&#8217;s 27 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably seen <a href="http://xkcd.com/verizon/">this check to Verizon</a> in an email before.  It was written by the comic xkcd in response to George Vacarro&#8217;s discovery that <a href="http://verizonmath.blogspot.com/">Verizon can&#8217;t tell the difference between 0.002 cents and $0.002</a>.  The whole story is at that link, but <a href="http://media.putfile.com/Verizon-Bad-Math">this recording of the call</a> says it all (it&#8217;s 27 minutes long, even though the player says over an hour).  Very much worth the listen.  Mind boggling!  </p>
<p>I was reading about how <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/01/atts-text-messages-cost-1310-per-megabyte/">text messages are a ripoff</a>, and I noticed that the AT&#038;T excerpt says, &#8220;.20 cents per text message.&#8221;  That&#8217;s for the iPhone.  For the rest right now it&#8217;s even cheaper at .15 cents per text!  Really?  Why am I paying $5 a month for 200 messages when I can get them for $0.30?<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/somedude/2629552522/" title="AT&amp;amp;T Text message rate 1 by some.dude, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3054/2629552522_f2cc149d61.jpg" width="500" height="484" alt="AT&amp;amp;T Text message rate 1" /></a></p>
<p>Here is the conversation that ensued with AT&#038;T customer service.  I asked&#8212;Jessica J. did not work at Verizon before.  Amazing&#8230;AT&#038;T are idiots too!</p>
<p><font color="#008000">Thank you for your patience! An AT&#038;T sales representative will be with you shortly.<br />
You are now chatting with Jessica J., an AT&#038;T sales representative.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> Welcome to AT&#038;T online Sales support.  How may I assist you with placing your order today?<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Hi. I was wondering what the price for text messaging is if I do not get a text plan.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> The standard rate for a text message is .15 cents a message sent or received.<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> The automated &#8220;chat&#8221; said .15 cents. Is that true???</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> 0.15 cents per message.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> We also have different packages available also<br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> Messaging 200 is $5.00 and includes 200 Text, Video, Picture or Instant Messages.<br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> Messaging 1500 is $15.00 and includes 1500 Text, Video, Picture or Instant Messages.<br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> For $20.00 a month, you have the freedom to message any way, to any one - text, picture, video and IM - without worrying what each message costs. That means every message counts the same. You can send and receive any combination of messages.<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> I currently have a plan and I have the 200 messages for $5 package.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Can I drop that package and get 0.15 cents per message?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> Do you feel that the 200 is enough?<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> If, without a package, text messages are 0.15 cents each, then I would rather do that.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Will I get the same rate even though I am an existing customer?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> Yes How many messages do you send a month?<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> About 200.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> It will save you money you keep the plan<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Not at 0.15 cents per message.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> That comes to 30 cents for 200 messages.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> I would rather pay 30 cents a month than 5 dollars a month.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> Actually the price would be $30.00 a month without the messaging plan<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> You said 0.15 cents per message, right?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> 0.15 cents multiplied by 200 is 30 cents.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> Correct<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> So it would be 30 cents a month if I sent 200 messages right?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> It would be $30.00 you are saving $25.00 a month on the messaging<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> May I ask if you have ever worked for Verizon?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> No I have not worked for them<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Oh, sorry, something reminded me of someone that worked for Verizon. Anyway&#8230;</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> I am having trouble understanding, if each message is 0.15 cents, how does it cost $30 for 200 messages?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Are you sure you do not mean that each message is 0.15 dollars?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> One message equals .15 cents so you multiply .15 by 200 and you get 30.00<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> 30.00 CENTS</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> think about it</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> give me one second<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> sure</font><br />
<em>[this wait lasted a good 3 minutes]</em><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> A.J. what I would recommend is you keep the $5.00 messaging package because if you decide to remove the package you will be charged .15 cents a message sent or received which you send about 200 messages a month then your bill would be $30.00 a month<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> I still don&#8217;t understand.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Are you sure you don&#8217;t mean that each message is 15 cents. As in 0.15 DOLLARS. $0.15???</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> That is correct<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Please tell me again how much each text message costs.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> The cost for each individual message is $0.15 cents a message<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Wait&#8230; $0.15?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> or 0.15 cents?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> or both? 0.15 dollarcents?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> Both the amount equals the same<br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> If you make 200 messages at 15 cents per messages it comes out to be $30.  With out plan for 200 messages it will only be $5 a month.  This will help you save money.<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> How much does a soda cost? 50 cents right?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> Correct<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> If I send you a soda, will you send me $50?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> If you want you do not have to keep a messaging plan.  If you wanted to get ride of that plan all you would have to do is call customer service and take it off your account.<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Ok, so according to the last thing you wrote, each text message is 15 cents. Not 0.15 cents. Is that correct?</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> That is correct.<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Thank you for the clarification. I will keep my current package.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Please advise your supervisor to update your materials.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> I apologize for all the confusion today. Is there anything else I can assist you with /<br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> ?<br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> 0.15 cents per message is a lot cheaper than $0.15 per message.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">A.J.:</font><font color="#ff0000"> Nope, thanks. Have a good afternoon.</font><br />
<font color="#0000ff">Jessica J.:</font> Thank you for choosing AT&#038;T.  Have a great day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/07/01/verizon-math-infects-att/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voice Tours</title>
		<link>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/05/09/voice-tours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/05/09/voice-tours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>some dude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Whatever</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>dorking out</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/05/09/voice-tours/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damn, they&#8217;re getting closer to stealing my idea.  &#8220;They&#8221; is anyone else that knows how to program something.  Here&#8217;s my idea&#8230;  
You know those self-guided tours&#8212;like Alcatraz&#8212;where you carry around a little electroic doohicky, walk around, and it tells you about whatever you&#8217;re standing in front of?  
If you replace the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, they&#8217;re getting closer to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/09/tag-the-world-with-geograffiti/">stealing my idea</a>.  &#8220;They&#8221; is anyone else that knows how to program something.  Here&#8217;s my idea&#8230;  </p>
<p>You know those self-guided tours&#8212;like Alcatraz&#8212;where you carry around a little electroic doohicky, walk around, and it tells you about whatever you&#8217;re standing in front of?  </p>
<p>If you replace the doohicky with a phone, you could listen to stories anywhere.  Now that phones either have GPS or can geolocate (triangulation), knowing where you are is no problem.  The &#8220;tours&#8221; could be produced by anyone.  Anyone could upload a story or series of stories online, or by calling in to their account.  If you call from the location you&#8217;re talking about, it could automatically mark the location, since your phone knows where you are.</p>
<p>&#8220;This pizza place is awesome after the bars.  I&#8217;m wasted.  By the way if you need to pee&#8230;I found this great secluded alley, behind the yellow trash can you can see from the corner.&#8221;  The stories could be a little more compelling than that, obviously.  It could even be categorized for more touristy stuff vs. every day stuff, by organization, or by topic&#8230; You could filter only points of interest left by some historical society, for example.</p>
<p>If you want to go on a walk about through the city, you could open the app on your phone and whenever you&#8217;re close to someone&#8217;s story/point of interest it would start playing their recording automatically.</p>
<p>So anyway, I just saw this thing called <a href="http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/05/09/talk-about-the-world-around-you-with-geograffiti/">Geograffiti</a> today that does something similar to my idea&#8230;or at least half of it.  And I thought of this like 2 years ago.  Seriously, I need to learn how to program, or find people that&#8217;ll work for me for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/05/09/voice-tours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Done.</title>
		<link>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/04/01/done/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/04/01/done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>some dude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Whatever</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>dorking out</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/04/01/done/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaaand we’re done.  Luke has a real job in real software now, so he dorks out full time and can’t use dorking out to dork out, so now he has to take up another dorky hobby.  Like ham radio.  Which means the back end of Chopstork will disintegrate further into oblivion.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaand we’re done.  Luke has a real job in real software now, so he dorks out full time and can’t use dorking out to dork out, so now he has to take up another dorky hobby.  Like ham radio.  Which means the back end of Chopstork will disintegrate further into oblivion.  I’ve taken up <a href=http://stupidfuncville.wordpress.com>Stupid Fun Cville</a>, and a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1211042741">dog</a>, and let’s face it, my posts have become lame regurgitations of videos that other people found first, with only the occasional original content anyway.  Plus it costs money, and I probably owe Luke hundreds of dollars, if he ever decides to collect on my share of the hosting fees.  And there’s no telling if anyone cares, based on the measly feedback we get.</p>
<p>Remember when this was a wiki.  And then another wiki (the Wikipedia one).  And Luke even made a fake blog setup for mediawiki.  And then we said wait a minute, why don’t we just use an <em>actual</em> blog.  I think it’s worked out pretty well.  I bet we lost some posts in the transition.  I guess we should archive this thing somehow before we shut it off.  If you want the file once I figure out how to do that, let me know.</p>
<p>So anyway, thanks for watching.</p>
<p>Update: April Fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/04/01/done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>video on flickr &#8230; FINALLY?</title>
		<link>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/03/16/video-on-flickr-finally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/03/16/video-on-flickr-finally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>some dude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>dorking out</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/03/16/video-on-flickr-finally/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From TechCrunch, a rumor (again) that Flickr will have video soon.  But this time they&#8217;re saying &#8220;in three weeks&#8221; instead of &#8220;soon&#8221;!  It&#8217;s like the Corner Bodo&#8217;s &#8220;coming soon.&#8221;  This is gonna rock.  Sorry, Andy&#8230;but for sharing video with the masses, YouTube will probably still be king.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/16/video-coming-to-flickr-soon-really/">TechCrunch</a>, a rumor (again) that Flickr will have video soon.  But this time they&#8217;re saying &#8220;in three weeks&#8221; instead of &#8220;soon&#8221;!  It&#8217;s like the <a href="http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2005/06/13/coming-soon-no-more/">Corner Bodo&#8217;s &#8220;coming soon.&#8221;</a>  This is gonna rock.  Sorry, Andy&#8230;but for sharing video with the masses, YouTube will probably still be king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2008/03/16/video-on-flickr-finally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linerider Mario World</title>
		<link>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2007/12/26/linerider-mario-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2007/12/26/linerider-mario-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 01:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>some dude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>dorking out</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>interw3b videos</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2007/12/26/linerider-mario-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Old Man, do you still find time for Line Rider in between your constant sessions of Desktop Tower Defense?  Check this out:




via Urban Retro Lifestyle
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old Man, do you still find time for <a href="http://www.linerider.com/">Line Rider</a> in between your constant sessions of <a href="http://www.handdrawngames.com/DesktopTD/Game.asp">Desktop Tower Defense</a>?  Check this out:</p>
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rn8ULJGboOE&#038;rel=1"></param>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rn8ULJGboOE&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<p><small>via <a href="http://www.urbanretrolifestyle.com/2007/04/02/a-giant-nintendo-round-up/">Urban Retro Lifestyle</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2007/12/26/linerider-mario-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shut up about the definition of insanity</title>
		<link>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2007/11/13/shut-up-about-the-definition-of-insanity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2007/11/13/shut-up-about-the-definition-of-insanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>some dude</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Whatever</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>dorking out</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2007/11/13/shut-up-about-the-definition-of-insanity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wherever you business types out there learned the slogan, &#8220;The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results,&#8221; with attribution to Einstein or Ben Franklin, please stop using it.  It&#8217;s stupid.  I heard it from an important person at work recently to motivate change in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wherever you business types out there learned the slogan, &#8220;The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results,&#8221; with attribution to Einstein or Ben Franklin, please stop using it.  It&#8217;s stupid.  I heard it from an important person at work recently to motivate change in the company&#8212;hmm, how convenient.  And sure is catchy.  &#8230;Doesn&#8217;t seem quite true though, does it?  </p>
<p>Well it&#8217;s not.  First off, neither Einstein nor Franklin said it.  No one knows who said it.  Someone else did the research for me <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Benjamin_Franklin#The_definition_of_insanity...">here.</a>  (Hey, teh internets is better than no source at all).  The quote appears to be attributed to Franklin for the first time in 2004.  Dead for 214 years and someone finally decided he was worth quoting?  It&#8217;s attributed to Einstein in 1998, and to some football guy, a comic, another football guy, and an author before that.</p>
<p>Second, the statement just isn&#8217;t true.  I don&#8217;t have a copy of DSM IV (psychology bible) to look up the medical definition (some would say the medical definition according to big pharma), or a law text book to look up the full legal definition, but you won&#8217;t find any sources that use the definition in question, except for people misquoting Einstein or Franklin.</p>
<p>So doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results is not insanity.  And vice versa is false.  <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2006/10/the_definition_of_insanity_is.html">Someone</a> <a href="http://www.morrisinstitute.com/weekly/mihv_pc_morris_71.html">else</a> might have said it already, but doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results &#8230; isn&#8217;t that just practice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2007/11/13/shut-up-about-the-definition-of-insanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UserFAlbum - 0.1.0</title>
		<link>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2006/05/11/userfalbum-share-your-flickr-photos-on-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2006/05/11/userfalbum-share-your-flickr-photos-on-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 01:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>dorking out</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chopstork.com/wordpress/2006/05/11/userfalbum-share-your-flickr-photos-on-wordpress/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UserFalbum is a wordpress plugin that extends FAlbum (v0.6.4) to display Flickr photos for each wordpress user.  FAlbum works great, but it can only pull pictures from one Flickr account, and I wanted to give each of our users the ability to share their own Flickr photos.  So, I wrote another plugin that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UserFalbum is a wordpress plugin that extends <a href="http://www.randombyte.net/blog/projects/falbum/">FAlbum </a>(<a href="http://www.randombyte.net/blog/2006/01/31/falbum-064/">v0.6.4</a>) to display <a href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a> photos for each wordpress user.  FAlbum works great, but it can only pull pictures from one Flickr account, and I wanted to give each of our users the ability to share their own Flickr photos.  So, I wrote another plugin that extends FAlbums to do just that.</p>
<p><strong>Features</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>FAlbum Features</li>
<li>Allows each user to share their photos</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Tested with FAlbum 0.6.4</li>
<li>Tested with WordPress 2.0</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Files</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="attachment" href="http://www.chopstork.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/userfalbum%20v0.1.0%20-%20README.txt" title="README.txt">README.txt</a></li>
<li><a rel="attachment" href="http://www.chopstork.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/userfalbum%20v0.1.0.zip">userfalbum  0.1.0.zip</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chopstork.com/blog/2006/05/11/userfalbum-share-your-flickr-photos-on-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
