The Depressing Irony of our Dysfunctional Politics
September 21st, 2008 by LukeThe Washington Post just printed an article dubbed “The Power of Political Misinformation”. I found this article ironic and depressing.
I found it ironic because *perhaps* the last third of an article about the power of misinformation is misinformation itself. Of course being a sissy liberal, I am predisposed to take these printed words as correct. Ironic indeed.
“…a series of new experiments show that misinformation can exercise a ghostly influence on people’s minds after it has been debunked — even among people who recognize it as misinformation. In some cases, correcting misinformation serves to increase the power of bad information.”
“…a paper approaching publication…[suggests] that Republicans might be especially prone to the backfire effect because conservatives may have more rigid views than liberals: Upon hearing a refutation, conservatives might “argue back” against the refutation in their minds, thereby strengthening their belief in the misinformation. [Researchers] did not see the same “backfire effect” when liberals were given misinformation and a refutation about the Bush administration’s stance on stem cell research.”
I found it depressing because if this article is accurate, then it is just one more reason why our public discourse and debate is so abysmal and dysfunctional. I am tired of distractions such as flag lapels, bridges to nowhere, and secret Muslims running for office. Instead, give me spirited debate on real issues such as off-shore drilling, health care, taxes, the economy, terrorism, climate change, and education. I am tired of one-issue politics such as abortion, gun control, global warming, and Creationism in public schools. These are all important issues, but we should *not* take them so fundamentally that we sacrifice other equally important problems and lose sight of the greater contexts.
Unfortunately, too many Liberal *and* Conservative Americans alike have been displaced by the “creative destruction” of our economy, culture, and technology. Unfortunately, too many of the Displaced have turned to fundamentalism for solace, simplicity, and identity. Unfortunately, too many politicians, pundits, and preachers are more than happy to exploit and encourage the fundamentalism of the Displaced in self-serving so called “culture wars”.
Anyway, as pointed out in an article by the Economist this sordid affair is mostly the Republican’s fault.
“In the past two weeks, while banks have tottered and markets reeled, the contending Democrats and Republicans have squabbled and lied rather than debated. Mr. McCain’s team has been nastier, accusing Mr. Obama of sexism for calling the Republican vice-presidential candidate a pig, when he clearly did no such thing. Much nastier has been the assertion that Mr. Obama once backed a bill that would give kindergarten children comprehensive sex education. Again, this was a distortion: the bill Mr. Obama backed provided for age-appropriate sex education, and was intended to protect children from sex offenders.”
Now we have learned that the very debunking of these slurs by a fiscally conservative publication may actually reinforce them.
Depressing, ironic, and dysfunctional indeed.


































September 21st, 2008 at 9:06 pm
The fact that the Economist is “fiscally conservative” should have no bearing on how much validity you give their argument. The blurb you posted was subjective commentary on some of the vitriol we’ve seen exchanged over the past few weeks. Nothing monetary about it. It also fails to mention things some people might find equally offensive from the other side. I hate Rush Limbaugh as much as the next guy, but the way the Obama campaign deliberately truncated some of his clips — changing the context drastically — and used them on its Spanish channel commercials is disheartening at best. For a guy who claims to be post-racial, you’d think his people would refrain from taking ironic commentary and presenting it in an incendiary fashion to the viewers most likely to take racially-based offense. (my spanish is weak, but the ad seems to attempt to link McCain to Limbaugh, which is ironic, because the little I know of Rush’s politics, he is completely at adds with McCain on immigration… a lot of people are). To me, the example is at the very least on par with taking Obama’s comprehensive sex education bill and presenting it to parents as “this guy wants sex ed in kindergarten,” which was likely put out there to scare people away from him.
What is depressing and dysfunctional to me is how many people — including smart people — don’t know bias when they see it. There’s a lot of human nature in that, but also a lot of unnecessary weakness. And really, laziness. It takes a while to read the actual wordings of bills — and verify that you are reading the version passed by both houses, not the individual, pre-congressional report versions — and then look up the voting records to see who a) showed up, b) who voted, and c) who voted something other than “present.” A huge pain in the ass, really. I rarely do it, and lately it seems like I’m made of free time. But I don’t know of any better way to guess how a candidate is likely to perform in the future, other than getting the exact actions he has performed in the past. The rest is empty promises and and horn-tooting. Actually, in recent times, it seems to be less of “here’s why you should vote for me” and more of “here’s why you shouldn’t vote for him.”
The amount of misinformation disseminated on both sides is deplorable; reading about it isn’t going to solve jack shit.
September 21st, 2008 at 10:30 pm
I definitely agree that neither party is innocent of misinformation and misleading adds. Moreover, I agree that I made a pretty big leap when blaming the GOP for these “sordid affairs”. Indeed, the Economists article does not support such a wide claim.
Backfire Effect anyone?
September 22nd, 2008 at 10:09 pm
I hate that you aren’t on Lockheed IM anymore. Let’s do beers soon. Or Rockband. Oh! I can bring my cowbell!!